The headline spec of the 10900K is the chip's core-count. The percolation of such thoughts led us to firing up said Core i9-10900K system and installing the same Asus GeForce RTX 3090 TUF Gaming OC as previously tested on Ryzen 9 3950X. Power draw is at record-levels with heat output going past 250W. An early review of the Core i9-10900K has been published ahead of the official embargo. The Intel Core i9-10900K achieves a 30% higher score than its predecessor but the AMD 3950X shoots out in front by 48.5%. However, the i9-10900K fared much worse in a Cinebench R15 multi-core comparison, lagging far behind a 16-core AMD Ryzen 9 3950X chip. Out of the 14 games tested, in half of them we saw virtually no difference in performance at 1440p and 4K between the Ryzen 9 3950X and Core i9-10900K. The biggest talking point of Cascade Lake-X, though, is the pricing. AMD 3950X vs Intel i9-10900K AMD 3950X vs Intel i9-10900T AMD 3950X vs Intel i9-10900TE. Share links. Intel Core i9-10900K 10 Core CPU Specifications. Les trois processeurs fonctionnent avec 16 Go de mémoire. Chinese TecLab group has published comparison of Intel Core i9 10900K, Ryzen 9 3950X and Ryzen 9 3900X processors. Core i9 10900K In 381 Benchmarks - It's A Ryzen Sandwich Discussion created by black_zion on May 28, 2020 Like • Show 0 Likes 0 Comparison of the technical characteristics between the processors, with the Intel Core i9-10900K on one side and the AMD Ryzen Threadripper 3990X on the other side. Le Core i9-10900K prend place sur une carte mère Z490. The sample tested by TecLab appears to be a retail version, meaning there should be no reason to believe that the sample was cherry-picked by Intel. The testers claim that the processors are retail goods, so there is no possibility of special customization by the manufacturer.. Here the 5900X basically matched the older 16-core 3950X and that meant it was 23% faster than its predecessor and 32% faster than its primary competitor, the 10900K… i9-10900k vs Ryzen 3950x. Starting out with the specs, the new Intel 10th gen i9-10900K is a 10 core 20 thread part. We compared two desktop CPUs: the 3.7 GHz Intel Core i9 10900K with 10-cores against the 3.4 GHz AMD Ryzen 9 5950X with 16-cores. Puedes esperar pagar alrededor de $100 dólares más por el procesador AMD Ryzen 9 que por el Intel Core i9. The landscape changes completely with multi-thread. If you found the comparison useful please consider sharing it: … El Ryzen 9 3950X tiene un precio de lista más alto que el Core i9-10900K, pero eso no se refleja en los precios del mundo real. If you look at the graphs – the lines don’t look like there is just a 4% difference with the single core result, or a 48.5% difference with the multi-core results. Why is AMD Ryzen 9 3950X better than Intel Core i9-10900K? 16 x 3.5GHz vs 10 x 3.7GHz Intel Core i9-10900K Desktop Processor 1... Intel Core i9-10900K Desktop Processor 10 Cores up to 5.3 GHz Unlocked LGA1200 (Intel 400 Series Chipset) 125W $529.89 Intel Core i9-10900K vs. AMD Ryzen 9 3950X - Benchmark, Geekbench 5, Cinebench R20, Cinebench R23, Cinebench R15 and FP32 iGPU (GFLOPS) benchmark results AMD 3950X – 3932 Intel Core i9-10900K – 2647.7 Intel Core i9-9900K – 2025.3 The Intel Core i9-10900K achieves a 30% higher score than its predecessor but the AMD 3950X shoots out in front by 48.5%. Following our initial Core i5 10600K and Core i9 10900K Linux benchmarks last week, here is a much larger comparison I have been working on since then in looking specifically at the Ryzen 9 3900X and 3950X against the Core i9 10900K. Intel Core i9-10900K vs. AMD Ryzen 9 3950X - Benchmark, CPU、比較、CPU VS、プロセッサの比較、プロセッサを比較する、プロセッサ一覧表、AMD、Intel、プロセッサ、CPU、ベンチマーク、Cinebench R20、Cinebench R23、Cinebench R15、Geekbench 5、PassMark CPU マーク Comparison between Intel Core i9-10900K and AMD Ryzen 9 3950X with the specifications of the processors, the number of cores, threads, cache memory, also the performance in benchmark platforms such as Geekbench 4, Passmark, Cinebench or AnTuTu. The closest you'll find from Intel is the Core i9 10980XE, or Core i9 10940X X-Series, which offer high core counts upwards of the usual S-series chips. Les Ryzen 9 3900X et Ryzen 3950X, sur une carte mère X570. Phoronix: Ryzen 9 3900X/3950X vs. Let’s see what the differences are in games and applications both at stock and while overclocked. The i9-9900K is 2.81% faster than the 3950X in the same test. 3950X vs i9-10900K specifications comparison The graphs below demonstrate the difference between i9-10900K and Ryzen 9 3950X most important features. Armed with 16 cores and 32 threads, the 3950X tests 48.61% faster than the i9-10900K, and a whopping 94.14% faster than the i9-9900K, which means the 3950X should land around 90% (±5%) faster than the i7-10700K. Coming to the specifications, the Core i9-10900K features 10 cores, 20 threads a total cache of 20 MB and a … The chips stack up based on core count, so the Core i9-10900K is at a disadvantage in this test compared to the 16-core 32-thread Ryzen 9 3950X and 12-core 24-thread Ryzen 9 3900X. The 10900K is a 9900K with 2 extra cores and the 3950X already offers double the performance in most productivity tasks and similar gaming performance. The 10900K will be more directly competing with the 3900X and 3950X here, although the 3900X is the most price-to-price competition. Intel sigue sufriendo una escasez de suministro con Core i9-10900K, lo que a su vez ha aumentado su costo. For linear algebra benchmarks with MT-DGEMM and AMG, the i9-10900K was situated between the 3900X and 3950X. The first is dedicated to the desktop sector, It has 10 cores, 20 threads, a maximum frequency of 5.3GHz. On this page, you'll find out which processor has better performance in benchmarks, games and other useful information. 1.51x faster CPU speed? I am doing a lot of CPU-heavy parallel compilation, with several IDEs open, so I need a lot of CPU cores and a lot of RAM (128 GB). Intel’s Core i9-10900K is supported by a wide range of 400-series chipsets, including the Z490, B470, B460, and H410. (Image credit: Future) Core i9 10900K specs. I'm looking for a new workstation laptop for work (usually work from home, sometimes I take the laptop with me, price, weight and size are not an issue). It's the largest to date with nearly 400 benchmarks being tested, most of them real-world test cases. The 3950X is most likely going to perform much better. Intel’s flagship Comet Lake-S CPU goes against Ryzen 9 series. Similar microprocessors use the same socket and architecture as Ryzen 9 3950X and Intel Core i9-10900KF. In the case of Core i9-10900K, we are dealing with a 10-core, 20-thread CPU with clocks that reach up to 5.3 GHz in Boost mode. Similarly, for the machine learning benchmarks with Numpy, SciKit-Learn, Intel oneDNN / MKL-DNN, PlaidML, and LC0, the i9-10900K was about 3% faster than the 3900X but behind the 3950X. The Core i9–10900K results in just under 42 FPS and is 21% faster than the measured performance of AMD’s Ryzen 3950X and 25% faster than the Ryzen 3900XT processor. Intel Core i9-10900K hands out huge Time Spy CPU Score but gets unsurprisingly left far behind by AMD Ryzen 9 3950X in Cinebench R15 multi-core comparison 04/30/2020 Discussion. ゲーマー向け最速は偽りなし、10コア20スレッド倍率アンロックCPU「Intel Core i9 10900K」をレビュー。Core i9 9900KやRyzen 9 3900X/3950Xとクリエイティブタスク性能やゲーミング性能をベンチ … Not to mention the 10900K is reportedly a hot mess. Intel has launched their new 10 core i9-10900K CPU, but how does it compare against AMD’s 16 core Ryzen 9 3950X? These characteristics, together with an IPC (instructions per cycle) number, determine how well a microprocessor performs. When the Intel i9-10900K had first released, it was a point of contention whether or not it outperformed the already existing Ryzen CPUs: namely the R9 3900X and R9 3950X. Intel Core i9-10900K vs Ryzen 9 3950X.